Summary[]
Could somebody trim the summary section? It's a bit too long and overly detailed. Thanks! - BatteryB7 20:55, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
I reworded some sentences but its still pretty long. -- LDrago 19:38, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
Recap[]
I'm currently in the midst of writing the recap so don't worry about it for now. -- LDrago 05:24, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
Skeets[]
Jus' wondering if anyone has found out who voiced Skeets in this episode? I've been looking around for a while but no site seems to have it listed. =/ --S.B.B 21:40, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
Clark's Changing into the blur[]
When Clark changes into The Blur,he zips the jacket till the collar,but when it shows him, it's zipped till the emblem. Go-On Red 18:15, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
How can you tell? You see it zipped from behind.--Jax Vos 14:11, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
I mean when clark is in the street as the blur. Go-On Red 18:15, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Ok I See what you mean. He stops sipping when he gets to his collar in the booth then when you see him again it's the way his typical Blur appearance is with the jaket zipped only to the emblem.
This episode and Homecoming don't jive together. There looks to be a flaw in the story line.[]
Booster Gold is from the future and obviously knows about Clark Kent's future and about Lois Lane. Skeets has access to all of history up to when Booster Gold stoled home. It is clear he knows Clark Kent is the Blur and he will become Superman. During the episode it is also clear he keeps going after Lois Lane for an interview and endorsement and to this point everything seems fine, but for one point. We know Clark and Lois marry based upon the Homecoming episode, which also shows the world and thus history books record Lois and Clark becoming man and wife. Additionally, by this point in the time line, history would show them engaged. Thus how can Booster Gold expect to get any help from Lois Lane?
If Booster Gold wanted the support of Lois Lane he would need to go back in time to before her falling in love with Clark Kent.
OK, now you know my concern. Can anyone help me see th flaw in my reasoning, understanding, etc OR is there a flaw in the story line for this episode? --IBHalliwell (talk) 21:47, December 30, 2013 (UTC)